benchmarks: 10 percent of annual demand extracted inside the EU, 40
percent processed inside the EU, and 25 percent recycled. Of these, the
it will determine how much of the critical-minerals value chain remains
inside the continent — and how much flows to partner countries like
represents the European Union's first comprehensive legislative response
to critical-minerals supply-chain concentration. The Act's three 2030
benchmarks — 10 percent extraction, 40 percent processing, 25 percent
recycling — are intended to rebuild European capability in a set of 34
critical materials that include lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite, rare
earths, manganese, tungsten, vanadium, niobium and the platinum-group
metals.¹
dependency at 65 percent across any stage of the value chain —
extraction, processing or refining. That cap is particularly
consequential because Chinese market share of refining for several
critical minerals currently sits well above 65 percent, which means the
simply diversifying at the margin.
accelerated permitting, priority financing access and coordinated
implementation support. Both EU-internal projects and external
partnerships can be designated under various provisions, creating formal
channels for Brazilian, African and Latin American projects to engage
with European industrial strategy.
substantial across most commodities. For rare earths, Europe currently
produces essentially zero mining output, processes less than 5 percent
of its demand, and recycles a negligible share. For lithium, European
mine production is concentrated in a handful of Portuguese and Finnish
operations with modest output relative to demand. For graphite, European
production is similarly marginal, and the continent imports most of its
consumption from China and, increasingly, Mozambique and Madagascar.
historically relied on Chinese and, to a lesser extent, Korean and
chemicals, separated rare-earth oxides, or specialty alloys. Rebuilding
that processing capability inside Europe requires not just new
facilities but also the technical workforce, chemical plant,
waste-management infrastructure and regulatory frameworks that
historically have not existed for these materials on European soil.
The 40 percent processing benchmark is the hardest of the three.
given known European deposits of lithium, cobalt and other commodities —
though expensive and politically contested in some jurisdictions.
growing end-of-life stock of batteries, magnets and specialty alloys
produced during the 2010s and early 2020s.
commitments measured in tens of billions of euros over a five-year
window. Rare-earth separation capacity, lithium hydroxide refineries,
nickel and cobalt precursor plants, graphite purification and
spheronisation facilities — all of these need to be built, commissioned
and ramped to commercial operation during the remainder of the decade.
designated in Portugal (lithium), Sweden (graphite), Germany
economics improved as commodity prices firmed during 2025, and several
major industrial holding companies committed capital to processing
facilities. But the aggregate trajectory remains well short of what the
40 percent benchmark would require.
tool for driving implementation. Projects designated as Strategic
receive priority permitting (aiming for 27 months maximum for extraction
projects and 15 months for processing projects), streamlined
environmental assessment, access to public-sector financing through the
coordination support from the European Critical Raw Materials Board.
across the EU. The geographic distribution reflects where credible
projects exist: Portugal for lithium, Sweden and Finland for
battery-chemical processing, Germany for recycling and magnet
manufacturing, Spain and France for specific refining and alloying
projects, Estonia and Slovakia for smaller strategic-processing
initiatives.
external partnerships, though the formal Strategic Project designation
under the Act is oriented primarily toward intra-EU initiatives. For
offtake contracts with European industrial buyers, and informal
coordination with EU industrial strategy rather than through formal
Strategic Project status.
mechanism for meeting demand that cannot be met from EU-internal supply.
materials on the EU list: niobium (CBMM's Araxá), lithium (Sigma and the
broader Jequitinhonha valley), rare earths (Serr